chemtrails.cc

Tag: tetra ethyl lead

UK Firm Octel Bribed Iraqis to Keep Buying Toxic Fuel Additive

by qbit on Jul.02, 2010, under In the News, What are they?

This is the same company that makes Stadis 450 anti-static additive, a likely candidate for the source of the barium in chemtrails.

London Guardian:

The former chief executive of a British chemical company faces the prospect of extradition to the US after the firm admitted million-dollar bribes to officials to sell toxic fuel additives to Iraq.

Paul Jennings, until last year chief executive of the Octel chemical works near Ellesmere Port, Merseyside, and his predecessor, Dennis Kerrison, exported tonnes of tetra ethyl lead (TEL), to Iraq. TEL is banned from cars in western countries because of links with brain damage to children. Iraq is believed to be the only country that still adds lead to petrol.

The company recently admitted that, in a deliberate policy to maximise profits, executives from Octel – which since changed its name to Innospec – bribed officials in Iraq and Indonesia with millions of dollars to carry on using TEL, despite its health hazards.

Leave a Comment :, , , , , more...

UK MET office fails to acknowledge particulate aerosol responsible for cloud nucleation

by qbit on Apr.19, 2010, under In the News, Optical Phenomena, What are they?

I’m reposting this propaganda for one reason.  Occasionally I see WW2-era pictures of propeller planes forming thick contrails; even what appear to be persistent chemtrails.   The obvious question to ask is ‘If chemtrails are formed by a jet fuel additive, how do you explain these pictures of thick contrails in old photos of propeller planes?’

The answer is simple.  Lead.  These old propeller planes used lead (tetra ethyl lead) in the fuel as an anti-knock agent.  It doesn’t particularly matter (no pun intended) which metallic aerosol is present in the exhaust.  The nucleation sites still increase water droplet and ice crystal formation and reduce their tendency to evaporate/sublimate into invisible gas in dry high altitude air.  Of course water vapor is a major byproduct of hydrocarbon combustion so if there are nucleation sites present, the water will tend to condense and persist in visible droplets or ice crystals more than if the fuel were clean burning with fewer nucleation sites.

Climate pimps like the UK Met will rarely acknowledge metallic aerosols  when discussing persistent contrail formation.  They will only refer to “vapor trails.”  But the MET is closely connected to UK’s Ministry of Defense, so it’s assumed everything they publish will have some propaganda value.  Why did they choose a picture of old propeller planes forming contrails, not satellite photos like these or modern jet aircraft that better illustrate the scope of the chemtrail program?

——————————–

Contrails Creating Clouds

Dr Jim Haywood, Met Office

Ben – Most of us are familiar with the long trails left behind by airplanes as they pass overhead.  But those trails, or contrails as they’re called, can actually give rise to clouds.  We’re joined by Dr. Jim Haywood who’s from the Met office.  Now thank you for joining us, Jim.  My first question really to get a broad idea is how were clouds normally formed?

Jim –   Well, clouds almost invariably form when the air that contains the water vapour cools.  Cooling is almost always initiated by a lifting action.  For example, air flowing over mountains can cause the air to cool to such an extent that the water in it condenses, forming a cloud.  Alternatively, you can have things like cool air undercutting warm air and forcing it to rise in frontal systems associated with low pressure systems in the mid latitudes.  So really, it’s just a case of air being forced to cool, the relative humidity – as meteorologists call it – exceeds 100% and the water in it condenses.

ContrailsBen –   When we see these big lines up in the sky, these contrails from airplanes, what are they actually made of?

Jim –   Obviously, most clouds that we can see from down here are made up of water droplets.  Contrails tend to be made up of ice crystals that grow when the conditions are favourable.

Ben –   How do these then go on to create a cloud?

Jim –   What you can get is – under certain conditions, which is basically cold and moist conditions  – the ice crystals that are initially formed by the aircraft contrail can grow.  It’s a bit like a physics experiment that you probably did at school where you grow crystals of copper sulphate or things in supersaturated solutions.  That’s exactly what’s happening here.  When the conditions are right, it’s cold enough and moist enough up in our atmosphere then the crystals that are initially injected can just grow tremendously and spread with the metrological flow.

Ben –   So we’re not talking about lots of individual particles like we will be for a normal cloud.  This is actually a very large ice crystal that just happens to be light enough to float about.  Is that right?

Jim –   The ice crystals, when they’re initially injected are about a 1000th of a millimetre typically in terms of size.  But as they grow, they can actually get many times that up to about 100 microns.  So, they do form very large crystals which are important in the earth’s radiation budget.

Ben –   These clouds are a bit different than normal clouds.  How do they affect the weather?  Are they rain clouds?  Are we likely to see rain from them or just perhaps a bit of shading or will they not affect us much at all?

Jim –   Well they do affect us in terms of the amount of sunlight that they let through.  That’s quite important.  They tend to reflect sunlight back out to space and lead to a cooling of the weather and consequently, the climate.  But they also trap out going long wave radiation.  So, heat radiation if you like, rather like the greenhouse effect.  So there’s these two competing effects.  You’ve got the reflection of solar radiation or sunlight back out to space and you’ve also got a greenhouse type of effect.  And what’s critical is really the balance between the cooling from the reflection of solar radiation and the warming due to the greenhouse type of effect of these crystals.

Ben –   So if they need particular conditions in which to form, does this mean that certain flight paths are actually more likely to create these clouds and therefore, we’re more likely to have this warming effect or this reduction of sunlight effect in certain areas?

Jim –   Yes, that’s right.  I mean, one of the area that’s particularly good for forming cirrus types of particles – these ice crystals – actually coincides with the air traffic corridors, particularly the one linking North America with Europe.  That’s a particular area that’s good for crystal formation and crystal growth.

Ben –   We’ve had a very, very relevant question from Neil Briscoe.  He said that he heard a while ago – thanks to the 9/11 attacks – when they grounded all the flights, people were able to work out the contrails during daylight hours, helped to prohibit warming by reflecting light back out into space.  But during night time, they actually increased warming.  Is this the same stuff that we’re talking about here?  Does it matter whether it’s day or night?

Jim –   Yes, it does indeed.  It’s exactly what that question is about.  Really, we’re talking about a cooling, if you like from the reflection of sunlight and a warming during the night time which can cause a reduction in what’s called the diurnal temperature range.  After 9/11, there was certainly evidence of a reduction in the diurnal temperature range from a particular study.  But it’s quite difficult to disentangle that signal, if you like from the natural meteorological events that can occur.  And when they looked at it in a little bit more detail, it became almost impossible to distinguish from other events that had nothing to do with 9/11.  You still could see this signal in diurnal temperature range, just due to the natural variability of the atmospheric system.

Ben –   So it may have an impact that we can’t see because it’s no bigger than noise.

Jim –   It’s just difficult to detect.  That’s right.

Ben –   And speaking of detecting it, how do we actually study these things?

Jim – Well, we study it by a number of ways.  We’ve been simulating these contrails and contrails induce cirrus in the state-of-the-science atmospheric models that we use at the Met office and the Hadley Centre for Climate Change.  We’ve also been having a look at various different aircraft measurement campaigns.  I’m involved with an aircraft measuring campaign where we’re trying to create contrails and actually measure the amount of reflected sunlight, and the amount of infrared heat energy that these contrails affect.  So, you can do it from a purely modelling perspective but it’s always better to base it on objective measurements.

Ben –   And, just finally, these contrails obviously tend to stay in one place in the sky.  When they go on to create this cirrus type clouds, do they also stay where they were created or do we find that they drift across the country and have that sort of effect on a slightly wider area?

Jim –   Yes.  We studied one particular contrail that was formed by an Awacs aircraft over the north sea and what we found was although that aircraft had only travelled 1500 kilometres, the area of cloud that it created was actually over 50,000 square kilometres.  This area of cloud – this was created last March – you could see quite clearly being vectored over the UK and lasted for several hours.  It actually lasted for around about 18 hours before the ice crystals started to dissipate.

Ben –   So that’s certainly something to think about next time you’re 30,000 feet above the UK.  You might actually be making it literally cooler for us down on earth in the daytime, possibly a little warmer at night.  That was Jim Haywood.  He’s from the Met Office.

March 2010

Leave a Comment :, , , , more...

Search

Still can't find what you're looking for? Please post a comment or contact us.