<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chemtrails.cc &#187; sulfur dioxide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chemtrails.cc/tags/sulfur-dioxide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chemtrails.cc</link>
	<description>Investigating the covert aerosol dispersal program known as "chemtrails."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Arrogant scientists and Obama administration should recall the story of the old lady who swallowed a fly.</title>
		<link>http://chemtrails.cc/2009/04/08/arrogant-scientists-should-recall-the-story-of-the-old-lady-who-swallowed-a-fly/</link>
		<comments>http://chemtrails.cc/2009/04/08/arrogant-scientists-should-recall-the-story-of-the-old-lady-who-swallowed-a-fly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>qbit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerosol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enironment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfur dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather modification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chemtrails.cc/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a better idea, you pea-brained, arrogant pieces of crap:

Instead of spewing more pollution into the atmosphere (which they're already doing anyway with the barium jet fuel additive), we should invest the money in alternative energy production and/or install better scrubbers on all coal/gas smokestacks.  It would be orders of magnitude more efficient to catch the pollution at the source rather than to try to sequester it from the atmosphere once its already been released and dispersed.  Keep in mind, co2 is a fraciton of 1% of our atmosphere!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chemtrails.cc/2009/04/08/arrogant-scientists-should-recall-the-story-of-the-old-lady-who-swallowed-a-fly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

