<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chemtrails.cc &#187; propaganda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chemtrails.cc/tags/propaganda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chemtrails.cc</link>
	<description>Investigating the covert aerosol dispersal program known as "chemtrails."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>UK MET office fails to acknowledge particulate aerosol responsible for cloud nucleation</title>
		<link>http://chemtrails.cc/2010/04/19/uk-met-office-fails-to-acknowledge-particulate-aerosol-responsible-for-cloud-nucleation/</link>
		<comments>http://chemtrails.cc/2010/04/19/uk-met-office-fails-to-acknowledge-particulate-aerosol-responsible-for-cloud-nucleation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>qbit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optical Phenomena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What are they?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tetra ethyl lead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chemtrails.cc/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m reposting this propaganda for one reason.  Occasionally I see WW2-era pictures of propeller planes forming thick contrails; even what appear to be persistent chemtrails.   The obvious question to ask is &#8216;If chemtrails are formed by a jet fuel additive, how do you explain these pictures of thick contrails in old photos of propeller planes?&#8217;
The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chemtrails.cc/2010/04/19/uk-met-office-fails-to-acknowledge-particulate-aerosol-responsible-for-cloud-nucleation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discovery Channel performs pointless, invalid experiment.</title>
		<link>http://chemtrails.cc/2009/11/21/discovery-channel-performs-pointless-invalid-experiment/</link>
		<comments>http://chemtrails.cc/2009/11/21/discovery-channel-performs-pointless-invalid-experiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>qbit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerosol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel additives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather modification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chemtrails.cc/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No mention of the patent for chemtrailing thru the jet fuel?

These lab tests are so rigged I don&#8217;t even know where to begin.  First of all it&#8217;s not double-blind.  This completely invalidates the results of this corporate media &#8220;study.&#8221;
Who&#8217;s to say where this sample of jet fuel they &#8220;purchased at random&#8221; from a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chemtrails.cc/2009/11/21/discovery-channel-performs-pointless-invalid-experiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

