Fuel Additives | chemtrails.cc

Tag: fuel additives

Discovery Channel performs pointless, invalid experiment.

by qbit on Nov.21, 2009, under In the News

No mention of the patent for chemtrailing thru the jet fuel?

These lab tests are so rigged I don’t even know where to begin. First of all it’s not double-blind. This completely invalidates the results of this corporate media “study.”

Who’s to say where this sample of jet fuel they “purchased at random” from a local airport really came from?

The proper method to test for barium and aluminum in air would be to take particulate samples by filtration at varying proximity to airports, and chart the composition of the captured particulates by mass spectrometer analysis. Some control samples would be purified air. Other control samples would be purposefully contaminated with barium and aluminum. Experimental samples would be actual atmospheric air. All samples would be numerically coded and scientists would not know which samples they were testing. Testing would be conducted by multiple independent labs who would not be told the nature of the test they are conducting.

What is the purpose of all the strobing (white flashes) while they are explaining how aluminum should not be present in jet fuel?

And why are we not looking for barium? Why are they making it about aluminum?

“The US Air force did not release a sample of their high performance jet fuel”

“We need to take advantage of everybody on this planet to help solve the problem of global warming. If we can do it with some form of climate engineering, all the better.”

-Alvila Gaskill, Jr. President, Environmental Reference Materials, Inc.

This documentary goes further than others mainstream documentaries have, but it’s still a fraud.

Leave a Comment :aerosol, barium, fuel additives, NASA, propaganda, weather modification more...

Predictive programming: “Toxic Skies” movie [update]

by qbit on Sep.23, 2009, under In the News, Morgellon's

Pop culture and media is often used to pre-emptively alter public perception of a real threat by presenting it in a fictional context. This is a preview to a movie starring actress Anne Heche, called Toxic Skies, which was aired Monday on Australian TV. (via Leo K)

Plot spoiler: Thanks to the commentor below, I finally was able to view this made-for-tv movie. Here’s a plot summary: Anne Heche’s character is a doctor who works for the World Health Organization. She is drawn into the chemtrails conspiracy by a patriot character who has been studying the chemtrails conspiracy and who’s brother was suicided because he knew too much.

Eventually Anne Heche and her patriot friend figure out that an evil drug company has been contracted to make the jet fuel additive, and the government has been adding the chemicals to the jet fuel. however the government intended to fight global warming by increasing cloud cover. Said drug company had been secretly modifying the chemicals to weaken peoples’ immune systems and create the conditions for a pandemic outbreak. The drug company had a secret vaccine for the virus all along but wanted to kill everyone else for profit or some other reason. After some heroic action scenes, the good guys steal the vaccine from the drug company and use it to save everyone (even people who are already infected).

In a related matter…

If this episode of The Lone Gunmen (a spinoff of the Fox network’s X-Files) bears any similarity. We should carefully analyze the propaganda in Toxic Skies. This episode of Lone Gunmen involves hijacking planes by remote control and flying them into the Word Trade Center complex as a pretext to wage war of aggression and profit. This aired in March of 2001. The first time I saw this it made my hair stand up.

The beauty of having this in a “conspiracy theory” show is that later the general public, with their poor memories and lack of critical thinking skills, will conflate this plot with alien abduction, wherewolves and other moon-bat conspiracy theories, thereby discrediting any doubt of the official story of 9/11.

A similar tactic is being applied in Toxic Skies.

10 Comments :bioweapons, CIA, denial, fuel additives, mass media, mind control more...

PDF version of “The Not-So Secret Ingredient: Stadis 450″ available

by qbit on Mar.04, 2009, under What are they?

I’ve uploaded a PDF version of The not-so-secret ingredient: Stadis 450 (dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid, barium salt).

Download the PDF here.

6 Comments :aerosol, albedo, barium, barium nitrate, barium sulfate, calcium, DuPont, enironment, fuel additives, global warming, Octel Starreon, Stadis 450, toxicity, Welsbach seeding more...

The not-so-secret ingredient: Stadis 450 (dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid, barium salt)

by qbit on Feb.16, 2009, under What are they?

DRAFT FEB 09 – Please check http://chemtrails.cc/ for latest revision.

PDF version

The most commonly used commercial turbine jet fuels today are named JET-A, JET-A1, and JET-B. All of these are kerosene type fuels except JET-B which is a kerosene-naphtha blend for colder climates [1, 2]. JET-A is used internationally and JET-A1 is available only in the US. The US military primarily uses its own kerosene jet fuel, JP-8, which is similar to JET-A1 [11, 2].

A number of chemical additives are used in these fuels including corrosion inhibitors, temperature stabilizers, detergents, and static electricity dissipators. Static dissipators are of particular importance to atmospheric aerosol and environmental research, due to their metal content and their widespread use in commercial and military jet fuel [17, 8]. Octel Starreon Stadis® 450 is a static dissipator, comprised of dinonylnapthalene sulfonic acid and other organic solvents, and according to the product MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet), it contains two “trade secret” ingredients [18]. Stadis 450 is the only approved anti-static additive for use in Air Force aviation fuels, including JP-8, JP-5, JET-A1, and JET-B [9]. DuPont, the original manufacturer, reports having divested its production of Stadis 450 in September of 1994 to Octel Starreon LLC , now a subsidiary of Innospec Fuel Specialties. Innospec also manufactures another static dissipator additive called Statsafe®. However, according to Exxon Mobil, Stadis 450 continues to be the static dissipator of choice for commercial and military aviation [17].

… static dissipator additive is widely used in jet kerosene …. Stadis® 450 is the only additive currently manufactured for use in aviation turbine fuels approved by the major turbine and airframe manufacturers.

Although the “trade secret” ingredients are well protected by the manufacturer, a recent study contracted by the EPA [10] and other sources strongly imply that these ingredients are salts of barium and/or calcium. The EPA classifies this dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid, barium salt as a “HPV” (High Production Volume) chemical, meaning it is “produced or imported into the United States in quantities of 1 million pounds or more per year [12].” This same study reports that “Based on the available toxicity results, dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid, barium salt appears to be the most biologically active member of the [dinonylnaphthalene] category [10].”

It is hypothesized that jet exhaust aerosol [4] is responsible for cloud seeding, rainbow diffraction, and dichroism observed in persistent contrails [5]. While “skeptics” may dismiss the very existence of persistent contrails, the phenomenon is widespread and commonly accepted among atmospheric scientists [7]. The exact cause of aerosol cloud seeding has been the subject of endless debate, but it has been shown conclusively that the earth’s albedo, or its overall reflectivity, is increased by contrail aerosol (see chemtrails.cc sattelite imagery category).

In the 3 days after the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 during which the FAA grounded all commercial aircraft in the US, a unique opportunity to study atmospheric aerosol presented itself. David J. Travis, University of Wisconsin found significant changes in surface temperature and presented his findings to the American Meteorological Society [6].

There are a number of byproducts of combustion of kerosene jet fuel and its additives, including water, carbon dioxide, soot, sulfuric and nitrous acid, sulfur and nitrogen oxides, and metal ions [3], although this is by no means a complete list. Carbon monoxide and aromatic hydrocarbons also result from incomplete combustion.

Aerosol and contrail formation processes in an aircraft plume and wake as a function of plume age and temperature [4].

Aerosol and contrail formation processes in an aircraft plume and wake as a function of plume age and temperature. (image courtesy GRID-Arendal)

Not surprisingly, UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) only makes casual mention of these metal particles, and fails to provide any information as to their role in atmospheric aerosol formation.

If one phenomenon gives away the presence of metals in the aerosol, it would be the large number of high altitude rainbows produced by contrail aerosol. Virtually unheard of prior to 1990, bright rainbows, sometimes referred to as “circumhorizon arcs” or more commonly, “chembows,” can be observed regularly wherever jet aircraft fly.

According to a patent issued to Hughes Aircraft Company for dispersing metallic aerosol into the stratosphere, particles may stay suspended for up to a year. Hughes Aircraft, a major US defense contractor [14, 15], has been bought and sold by other defense contractors such as Boeing and Raytheon in recent years.

Exeprt from United States Patent 5003186:

The particles may be seeded by dispersal from seeding aircraft; one exemplary technique may be via the jet fuel as suggested by prior work regarding the metallic particles. Once the tiny particles have been dispersed into the atmosphere, the particles may remain in suspension for up to one year.

To avoid making qualitative judgments, I will not belabor the point that the horizon has been consistently gray, anywhere near commercial airports, since at least the early 1990s. But it would appear that the metal aerosol is indeed being dispersed, and staying suspended. While corporate media generally claims there can be no further debate about climate change, there are thousands of respected scientists who dispute the notion that atmospheric CO2 is the primary cause, and take exception to the idea that human intervention is required to “correct” it. At least 400 of them have testified to this effect to the US Senate [16].

Critical thinkers must question whether, with such flimsy scientific evidence, controlling the climate is the true motivation behind this metal aerosol dispersal. A 10 mile thick blanket of metal aerosol may have other uses to the militaries of the world, particularly in the fields of surveillance, aircraft and missile guidance, radar ducting, and radio frequency weapons systems.

Citations