Comments on: News report about barium and chemtrails

By: A Pilot

A Pilot — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:07:06 +0000

Yep there’s barium calcide in jet fuel.these ingredients are salts of barium and/or calcium. The EPA classifies this dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid, and are part of JetA1, JP-8(military jet fuel). We always thought they were anti-icing agents added to fuel for high altitude tubine and jets. Does it cause additional nuclie for rain production? Who knows, but those are two of the chemicals also added to some flares for cloud seeding.

By: qbit

qbit — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:34:04 +0000

I’m not saying the whole testing process was wrong, just that the reporter put the decimal in the wrong place when he read it.

i’d propose testing rain water and air samples. As you may know, rain comes from clouds so it certainly is a good indicator of what particulates are in the air. Air samples would be ideal.

I agree ground water is not useful for measuring barium content in air due to contamination.

By: Stars15k

Stars15k — Tue, 19 May 2009 02:12:39 +0000

That’s really strange thinking. To hear a report is wrong, and choose to think it is right doesn’t say much for critical thinking. Barium aerosol does not exist. Tests need to be done in situ, not ground water and runoff. There have been many tests run this way and it is always the same, exhaust. Where are the other of the “many tests confirming” barium? I’ve looked and keep coming back to this report as the basis of comparison. No one needs to cough up any $$ for testing. It’s been done, more than once. You just have to use better research materials and methods. Oh, and rain water and runoff are not valid to use for atmospheric testing, unless you can exclude all other sources of the element in question. Barium exists in ground level sources, therefore cannot be counted unless and until it is found in aerosol form.

By: qbit

qbit — Tue, 05 May 2009 12:55:04 +0000

I noticed this about the units being off, and of course it does not follow proper scientific sample collection methods, but this is just one of many tests confirming high levels of barium in rain water and surface runoff.

i’m more interested in the fact that they actually allowed this in the corporate media. there’s little doubt in my mind the barium aerosol exists.

why don’t you cough up $1k, collect some rain water samples and have LCMS tests done yourself? send me the money, i’ll do it. I will follow proper sample collection procedure and conduct double blind tests.

By: stars15k

stars15k — Tue, 05 May 2009 12:18:38 +0000

Uh, this has been debunked thoroughly, by the reporter himself. He obviously says the printed number wrong, then the measurement unit wrong, then the fact that there is sampling by ground level mayo-jar in my dad’s pickup truck in the backyard is not valid. In pretty much everyway this report is wrong.